Micius-Flash-Preview

GitHub Hugging Face Technical report Coming soon

27B

256K context
Natively multimodal, with deep thinking

Average across 12 hardware-code evals
64.2
Gain over Qwen3.8-27B
+15.0
Hardware-code eval questions
6,798
Gain over Qwen3.8-27B: 12 hardware-code evals Qwen3.8-27BMicius-Flash-Preview

Real case: hardware code Q&A, Micius-Flash-Preview vs DeepSeek V4 Pro

ENOdd Clock Divider · Code & Execution

Real case: semiconductor knowledge Q&A, Micius-Flash-Preview vs DeepSeek V4 Pro

ENAcross the Coil: 0.7 V or 12.7 V?

Today, Zhiman officially releases Micius-Flash-Preview, its flagship LLM for scientific research and complex engineering R&D, with online access and API access open now and model weights to follow.

Micius (墨子) is Zhiman’s LLM series for science and engineering, with semiconductors, a field dense with knowledge, with long engineering chains and highly concentrated professional tools, as its first focus. It is a model that understands engineering, uses tools and delivers: it reads process documents, circuit schematics and chip layouts, generates and debugs RTL and EDA engineering code, and calls KiCad and related EDA toolchains on its own to finish multi-step engineering tasks.

Context
256K
Architecture
Natively multimodal
Reasoning
Deep thinking mode
Average coding output*
~15K tokens

High capability density

An average of 64.2 across 12 hardware-code evals, 15.0 points above Qwen3.8-27B and above DeepSeek-V4-Pro (63.8); 62.41 on the semiconductor Agent bench, also above DeepSeek-V4-Pro (57.29).

Low deployment bar

Deploys on a single 48 GB-class professional GPU; the quantized version runs on a 24 GB consumer GPU.

Data stays in your domain

Supports private deployment on enterprise intranets, meeting semiconductor R&D’s strict requirements for design data security.

* The average across 13 semiconductor-related coding benchmarks, including VerilogEval v2, RTLLM v2.0 and ChipBench.

Semiconductor R&D needs results that can be verified

10+major stages from requirements to tape-out
$1M+floor on 7–28nm mask costs · Source
300,000integrated-circuit talent gap · Source

General models lack high-quality semiconductor corpora, hardware-code data and professional tool environments, and the stronger closed models cannot be deployed locally. The industry needs a specialist model that fills in the domain knowledge, operates professional tools and supports private deployment.

Specialist abilities in four directions

Semiconductor knowledge

Answers process, device and circuit questions, reasoning from physical principles.

Chip and circuit code

Generates Verilog, VHDL and EDA scripts that pass compilation and simulation.

Engineering Agent

Completes multi-step tasks on its own in professional tools such as EDA and KiCad.

Multimodal understanding

Understands engineering images: circuit diagrams, schematics, layout screenshots and waveforms.

From 18 knowledge trees to multi-teacher online distillation

Knowledge tree structure (schematic)

Most of Micius’s R&D effort goes into the data flywheel: the team built semiconductor knowledge trees from 10 disciplinary perspectives and 8 industry-and-standards perspectives, then mapped authoritative corpora onto the knowledge nodes, so every training question traces back to a specific source.

In training, seven domain Teachers are first trained on their specialties, then multi-teacher online distillation (MOPD) brings their abilities together into one model. Code and tool-call trajectories are all verified by actually running them in a sandbox, so what the model learns is engineering behaviour that runs and can be verified.

97%+knowledge-node coverage
210K+candidate semiconductor Q&A
7domain Teachers
  1. Knowledge trees and authoritative corpora
  2. Data synthesis and cleaning
  3. 7 domain Teachers
  4. Multi-teacher online distillation
  5. Micius-Flash-Preview
The full data pipeline, training method and evaluation details will be published with the technical report.

Where it leads, and where it still falls short

Semiconductor knowledge and multimodal

Above Qwen3.8-27B on 12 of 13 metrics; the highest of all models evaluated on RFSchemBench overall and CircuitSense, and tied highest on SuperGPQA microelectronics.

Hardware code

Above Qwen3.8-27B on all 12. An average of 64.2, above DeepSeek-V4-Pro (63.8) and close to DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (65.4); GPT 5.6 Sol (72.3) still leads.

General ability

HMMT rises from 81.82 to 87.9; MMLU-Pro is 84.2, below Qwen3.8-27B’s official result of 87.5, and is the part still to close.

Semiconductor knowledge and multimodal8

Zhiman-SemiBench

in-house
GPT 5.6 Sol 88.0
Claude Opus 5 71.3
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 70.1
DeepSeek-V4-Pro 67.7
Micius-Flash-Preview 49.7
Kimi K2.6 45.5
Qwen3.8-27B 42.5
Muse Glimmer 30B 29.9

SuperGPQA-semi · Overall

Claude Opus 5 82.1
Micius-Flash-Preview 77.9
GPT 5.6 Sol 77.5
DeepSeek-V4-Pro 77.5
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 76.9
Kimi K2.6 76.9
Qwen3.8-27B 73.9
Muse Glimmer 30B 70.4

SuperGPQA-semi · Microelectronics

Micius-Flash-Preview 84.0
Claude Opus 5 84.0
DeepSeek-V4-Pro 82.0
Kimi K2.6 82.0
GPT 5.6 Sol 78.0
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 78.0
Qwen3.8-27B 76.0
Muse Glimmer 30B 70.0

RFSchemBench · Overall

Micius-Flash-Preview 72.4
Qwen3.8-27B 66.8
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 56.1
Muse Glimmer 30B 54.9
GPT 5.6 Sol 50.8

RFSchemBench · Dynamic reasoning

Micius-Flash-Preview 67.3
Qwen3.8-27B 50.9
Muse Glimmer 30B 40.0
GPT 5.6 Sol 32.7
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 16.4

RFSchemBench · Component understanding

Micius-Flash-Preview 84.5
Qwen3.8-27B 76.2
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 61.0
Muse Glimmer 30B 54.5
GPT 5.6 Sol 52.7

PCB-Bench (345 questions)

GPT 5.6 Sol 87.0
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 82.3
Micius-Flash-Preview 80.6
Qwen3.8-27B 80.0
Kimi K2.6 77.4
Muse Glimmer 30B 72.2

CircuitSense (169 questions)

Micius-Flash-Preview 71.0
Qwen3.8-27B 69.8
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 66.9
GPT 5.6 Sol 60.4
Muse Glimmer 30B 52.1
Kimi K2.6 49.7

Hardware and engineering code12

CVDP-static

GPT 5.6 Sol 65.8
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 62.8
Claude Opus 5 60.6
Micius-Flash-Preview 58.9
DeepSeek-V4-Pro 57.3
Kimi K2.6 51.0
Qwen3.8-27B 43.7
Muse Glimmer 30B 39.4

VerilogEval-v2

GPT 5.6 Sol 94.2
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 92.0
DeepSeek-V4-Pro 89.7
Micius-Flash-Preview 86.8
Muse Glimmer 30B 82.6
Kimi K2.6 77.8
Qwen3.8-27B 77.8
Claude Opus 5 73.0

RTLLM-v2

Claude Opus 5 81.4
Micius-Flash-Preview 79.1
GPT 5.6 Sol 79.1
DeepSeek-V4-Pro 79.1
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 74.4
Kimi K2.6 72.1
Muse Glimmer 30B 65.1
Qwen3.8-27B 65.1

ArchXBench

Claude Opus 5 85.7
GPT 5.6 Sol 80.0
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 69.0
DeepSeek-V4-Pro 66.2
Muse Glimmer 30B 56.3
Kimi K2.6 53.5
Micius-Flash-Preview 53.5
Qwen3.8-27B 50.7

NetlistBench

Kimi K2.6 90.6
Claude Opus 5 84.9
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 84.8
Micius-Flash-Preview 83.8
Muse Glimmer 30B 83.0
DeepSeek-V4-Pro 78.0
GPT 5.6 Sol 75.6
Qwen3.8-27B 69.8

VHDLBench

Claude Opus 5 87.9
GPT 5.6 Sol 84.5
DeepSeek-V4-Pro 83.5
Micius-Flash-Preview 76.2
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 74.8
Muse Glimmer 30B 73.8
Kimi K2.6 72.3
Qwen3.8-27B 70.9

Pluto

GPT 5.6 Sol 78.5
Claude Opus 5 73.3
Micius-Flash-Preview 72.4
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 69.8
DeepSeek-V4-Pro 68.1
Kimi K2.6 65.5
Muse Glimmer 30B 64.7
Qwen3.8-27B 62.1

NotSoTiny

GPT 5.6 Sol 18.8
DeepSeek-V4-Pro 17.4
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 16.4
Micius-Flash-Preview 16.1
Qwen3.8-27B 14.7
Muse Glimmer 30B 12.7
Kimi K2.6 12.6

Rule2DRC

GPT 5.6 Sol 75.5
Claude Opus 5 68.1
Micius-Flash-Preview 48.3
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 38.9
DeepSeek-V4-Pro 34.6
Kimi K2.6 29.0
Muse Glimmer 30B 5.8
Qwen3.8-27B 4.9

PyHDL-Eval

Claude Opus 5 76.2
GPT 5.6 Sol 74.5
Micius-Flash-Preview 65.8
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 55.1
DeepSeek-V4-Pro 53.7
Muse Glimmer 30B 49.8
Kimi K2.6 46.5
Qwen3.8-27B 19.6

CreativEval

GPT 5.6 Sol 94.1
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 90.8
Claude Opus 5 88.3
DeepSeek-V4-Pro 88.3
Micius-Flash-Preview 79.2
Kimi K2.6 72.5
Qwen3.8-27B 71.7
Muse Glimmer 30B 70.8

ChipBench

Claude Opus 5 66.2
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 55.6
Kimi K2.6 51.1
Micius-Flash-Preview 50.4
DeepSeek-V4-Pro 50.4
GPT 5.6 Sol 46.6
Muse Glimmer 30B 39.9
Qwen3.8-27B 39.1

Agent and general ability4

Semiconductor Agent

GPT 5.6 Sol 87.3
Micius-Flash-Preview 62.4
DeepSeek-V4-Pro 57.3
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 47.7
Qwen3.8-27B 45.2
Muse Glimmer 30B 28.8
Kimi K2.6 22.7

GameCraft · Total

GPT 5.6 Sol 60.5
Micius-Flash-Preview 50.5
Qwen3.8-27B 32.1
Kimi K2.6 30.7
DeepSeek-V4-Pro 2.2

HMMT

GPT 5.6 Sol 93.9
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 90.9
DeepSeek-V4-Pro 90.9
Micius-Flash-Preview 87.9
Claude Opus 5 87.9
Qwen3.8-27B 81.8
Kimi K2.6 75.8
Muse Glimmer 30B 57.6

MMLU-Pro

GPT 5.6 Sol 88.9
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 88.4
DeepSeek-V4-Pro 88.4
Qwen3.8-27B 87.5
Kimi K2.6 87.3
Micius-Flash-Preview 84.2
Muse Glimmer 30B 83.5

Beyond the numbers, tested on real engineering

Micius Harness is Zhiman’s in-house engineering Agent platform. It connects the model’s industry knowledge, code and tool-calling abilities with professional software such as EDA and KiCad, and with real projects. Engineers state the task in natural language, confirm at key points, and check the source files, waveforms, layouts and rule-check reports one by one. Every task below was completed by Micius on its own.

DEMO 1

RTL-to-GDS chip design

Completes logic synthesis, place and route, timing analysis, and DRC and LVS layout verification on its own, delivering the GDS, the netlist and the verification reports. The whole flow takes about ten-odd hours; the traditional flow usually takes weeks to months.

346
tool calls
0
router DRC violations
15 rounds
of self-correction after errors

DEMO 2

Transistor control board PCB

Starting from component-library search and part selection, Micius generates the schematic and then the PCB in KiCad, completes placement, routing and copper-pour trimming for 9 footprints, and finally exports a 3D render straight from the submitted PCB file. The video replays the actual tool-call record of this task.

8
design stages
9
footprints
12
copper-pour edits

DEMO 3

Chip package design workbench

Taking a WB-PBGA package as the example, it builds package-design software from natural-language requirements and completes an actual design, closing the full loop of “engineering need → purpose-built tool → engineering task”.

DEMO 4

Replicating and merging industrial software

Explores FreeCAD, Calc and Blender on its own and integrates them into new software that models, calculates and renders; change a dimension and the model, the calculation results and the render all update together.

Micius Harness workbench

Engineers talk with the model in one interface while viewing waveforms, layouts, 3D models and run previews.

Chip engineering

Reads the project notes, analyses the waveforms, then interprets the design against the synthesized netlist and the physical layout.

PCB analysis

Opens the board file, summarises its layers and components, then rotates and spreads the layers to inspect them.

CAD mechanical design

Opens a 3D model, measures dimensions directly, sections it to see inside and checks the sketch constraints.

Godot robot scene

Inspects and exports an existing scene, previews it running on the same screen, pauses, single-steps and switches cameras.

Runs on a single GPU, works on your intranet

Local deployment

Supports mainstream inference frameworks such as vLLM, SGLang and Ollama.

VersionGPU
FP848 GB-class professional GPU
4-bit24 GB consumer GPU

API access

Connect through the Zhiman Open Platform, compatible with the OpenAI and Anthropic interfaces. At public API prices, the cost per token is more than 80% lower than leading closed models, and the overall inference cost of a typical long-chain industrial Agent task is expected to fall by more than 70%.

Weights and tools

Model weights will be released soon; stay tuned. Micius Harness offers a CLI and a desktop workbench; the desktop app supports macOS and Windows.

Iterating in real R&D

A larger Micius model is expected to launch soon. Next, Micius will go into the real R&D flows of chip-design companies and fabs to be tested there, with tape-out results, sign-off reports and engineer reviews as the final measure; failures exposed in real tasks will be traced to specific nodes in the knowledge tree, so iteration is measurable and traceable.

Starting from semiconductors, this method of “knowledge trees + data synthesis + online distillation + an engineering closed loop” will gradually extend to more fields of scientific research and engineering R&D, such as materials and energy.

Micius is named after Mozi, who both explored the principles of optics and mechanics and built devices, working hands-on in engineering. The name keeps reminding the team: take knowledge deep, and see engineering through.

Engineers and R&D teams in semiconductors and related fields are welcome to try Micius, connect to Harness and send us feedback.